Marks will be awarded appropriately for:
. Introduction to the essay that fully explains the central issues of the essay, gives an overview of the key issues addressed within the essay, shows an understanding of the assignment
requirements, indicates the direction of arguments contained in the essay, and links appropriately to the main content – maximum 5 marks.
. Essay that is well-structured with logical flow of arguments; professional layout and presentation; appropriate language, spelling and grammar – maximum 5 marks.
. Relevant definition of corporate sustainability that provides context for the discussion of the importance of corporate sustainability – maximum 5 marks.
. Relevant discussion of previous studies on the importance of corporate sustainability (up to 10 marks); summarisation and synthesis of arguments of others on the importance of
corporate sustainability (up to 5 marks); and interpretation of and conclusion on the key issues and arguments (up to 5 marks) – maximum 20 marks.
. Critical and evaluative discussion of relevant previous studies on the importance of
sustainability reporting that links to the need for quality standards to guide preparation of such reports (up to 15 marks); summarisation and synthesis of arguments of others on the importance of sustainability reporting (up to 5 marks); and interpretation and conclusion of the key issues and arguments (up to 5 marks) – maximum 25 marks.
. Relevant definition of stakeholder partnerships that provides context for the discussion of the importance of stakeholder partnerships in achieving sustainability – maximum 5 marks.
. Critical and evaluative discussion of relevant previous studies on the importance of
stakeholder partnerships in achieving sustainability (up to 10 marks); summarisation and
synthesis of arguments of others on the importance of sustainability (up to 5 marks); and
interpretation and conclusion of the key issues and arguments (up to 5 marks) – maximum 20 marks.
. Conclusion to the essay that is stated clearly, remind the reader of points covered in the essay, and show how the academic essay assignment brief was executed – maximum 5 marks.
. Essays that are correctly and consistently referenced using Harvard Cite Them Right
referencing style. for intext citations and citations in the list of references – maximum 10 marks.
Total marks available – 100.
Further information on university mark descriptorscan be found here.
This assignment is designed to assess the following learning outcomes:
. Be able to understand the aspects and theories that apply to corporate governance, and corporate sustainability.
. Be able to discuss and appraise the multiple roles of multi-national businesses in sustainable development and the socio-political environment including the ethical issues involved.
. Demonstrate the capacity to conduct logical and critical analysis and draw reasoned conclusions.
. Demonstrate the capacity for independent and self-managed learning.
Use of a range of published academic material for a given purpose.
Assessment Details
The word count for the case study is 2,250 words +/- 10%.
There will be a penalty of a deduction of 10% of the mark for work exceeding the word limit by 10% or more.
The word limit includes tables, figures, quotations and citations, but excludes the references list and appendices.
|