#
FIT1045作业代做、代写Algorithms课程作业、Python编程语言作业调试、代写Python实验作业
代做Python程序|帮做Haskell程序

FIT1045 Algorithms and programming in Python, S2-2020

Programming Assignment

Assessment value: 22% (10% for Part 1 + 12% for Part 2)

Due: Week 6 (Part 1), Week 11 (Part 2)

Objectives

The objectives of this assignment are:

• To demonstrate the ability to implement algorithms using basic data structures and operations on them.

• To gain experience in designing an algorithm for a given problem description and implementing that

algorithm in Python.

• To explain the computational problems and the challenges they pose as well as your chosen strategies and

programming techniques to address them.

Submission Procedure

You are going to create a single Python module file regression.py based on the provided template. Submit a

first version of this file at the due date of Part 1, Friday midnight of Week 6. Submit a second version of this

file at the due date of Part 2, Friday midnight of Week 11.

For each of the two versions:

1. Save the current version of your regression.py into a zip file called

yourStudentID yourFirstName yourLastName.zip.

2. Submit this zip file to Moodle.

3. Your assignment will not be accepted unless it is a readable zip file containing a file called products.py.

Important Note: Please ensure that you have read and understood the university’s policies on plagiarism

and collusion available at http://www.monash.edu.au/students/policies/academic-integrity.html. You

will be required to agree to these policies when you submit your assignment.

A common mistake students make is to use Google to find solutions to the questions. Once you have seen a

solution it is often difficult to come up with your own version. The best way to avoid making this mistake is

to avoid using Google. You have been given all the tools you need in workshops. If you find you are stuck, feel

free to ask for assistance on Moodle, ensuring that you do not post your code.

Marks and Module Documentation

This assignment will be marked both by the correctness of your module and your analysis of it, which has to be

provided as part of your function documentations. Each of the assessed function of your module must contain

a docstring that contains in this order:

1. A one line short summary of what the function is computing

2. A formal input/output specification of the function

3. Some usage examples of the function (in doctest style); feel free to augment and alter the examples for the

assessed functions that are already provided in the template if you feel they are incomplete or otherwise

insufficient (provide some explanations in this case)

1

4. A paragraph explaining the challenges of the problem that the function solves and your overall approach

to address these challenges

5. A paragraph explaining the specific choices of programming techniques that you have used

6. [only for Part 2] A paragraph analysing the computational complexity of the function; this does not imply

that a specific computational complexity such as O(n log n) is required just that the given complexity is

understood and analysed

For example, if scaled(row, alpha) from Lecture 6 was an assessed function (in Part 2 and you are a

FIT1045 student) its documentation in the submitted module could look as follows:

def scaled(row, alpha):

""" Provides a scaled version of a list with numeric elements.

Input : list with numeric entries (row), scaling factor (alpha)

Output: new list (res) of same length with res[i]==row[i]*alpha

For example:

>>> scaled([1, 4, -1], 2.5)

[2.5, 10.0, -2.5]

>>> scaled([], -23)

[]

This is a list processing problem where an arithmetic operation has to be carried out

for each element of an input list of unknown size. This means that a loop is required

to iterate over all elements and compute their scaled version. Importantly, according

the specification, the function has to provide a new list instead of mutating the input

list. Thus, the scaled elements have to be accumulated in a new list.

In my implementation, I chose to iterate over the input list with a for-loop and to

accumulate the computed scaled entries with an augmented assignment statement

(+=) in order to avoid the re-creation of each intermediate list. This solution allows a

concise and problem-related code with no need to explicitly handle list indices.

The computational complexity of the function is O(n) for an input list of length n. This

is because the for loop is executed n times, and in each iteration there is constant

time operation of computing the scaled element and a constant time operation of

appending it to the result list (due to the usage of the augmented assignment

statement instead of a regular assignment statement with list concatenation).

"""

res = []

for x in row:

res += [alpha*x]

return res

Beyond the assessed functions, you are highly encouraged to add additional functions to the module that you

use as part of your implementation of the assessed functions. In fact, such a decomposition is essential for a

readable implementation of the assessed function, which in turn forms the basis of a coherent and readable

analysis in the documentation. All these additional functions also must contain a minimal docstring with the

items 1-3 from the list above. Additionally, you can also use their docstrings to provide additional information,

which you can refer to from the analysis paragraphs of the assessed functions.

This assignment has a total of 22 marks and contributes to 22% of your final mark. For each day an

assignment is late, the maximum achievable mark is reduced by 10% of the total. For example, if the assignment

is late by 3 days (including weekends), the highest achievable mark is 70% of 15, which is 10.5. Assignments

submitted 7 days after the due date will normally not be accepted.

Mark breakdowns for each of the assessed functions can be found in parentheses after each task section below.

Marks are subtracted for inappropriate or incomplete discussion of the function in their docstring. Again,

readable code with appropriate decomposition and variable names is the basis of a suitable

analysis in the documentation.

2

Overview

In this assignment we create a Python module to perform some basic data science tasks. While the instructions

contain some mathematics, the main focus is on implementing the corresponding algorithms and finding a

good decomposition into subproblems and functions that solve these subproblems. In particular, we want to

implement a method that is able to estimate relationships in observational data and make predictions based

on these relationships. For example, consider a dataset that measures the average life expectancy for various

countries together with other factors that potentially have an influence on the life expectancy, such as the

average body mass index (BMI), the level of schooling in that country, or the gross domestic product (GDP)

(see Table 1 for an example). Can we predict the life expectancy of Rwanda? And can we predict how the life

expectancy of Liberia will change if it improved its schooling to the level of Austria?

Country Adult Mortality Infant Deaths BMI GDP Schooling Life expectancy

Austria 10.77 4.32 25.4 4.55e+11 15.7 81.1

Georgia 18.23 15.17 27.1 1.76e+10 13.5 74.5

Liberia 29.95 74.52 24.0 3.264e+09 9.8 61.1

Mexico 30.73 17.29 28.1 1.22e+12 12.9 76.6

Rwanda 35.31 64.04 22.1 9.509e+09 10.8 ?

Table 1: Example dataset on Life Expectancy.

To answer these questions, we have to find the relationships between the target variable—in case of this example

the life expectancy—and the explanatory variables—in this example ”Adult Mortality”, ”Infant Deaths”, etc.

(see Figure 1). For this we want to develop a method that finds linear relationships between the explanatory

variables and the target variable and use it to understand those relationship and make predictions on the

target variable. This method is called a linear regression. The main idea of linear regression is to use data to

infer a prediction function that ’explains’ a target variable through linear effects of one or more explanatory

variables. Finding the relationship between one particular explanatory variable and the target variable (e.g.,

the relationship between schooling and life expectancy) is called a univariate regression. Finding the joint

relationship of all explanatory variables with the target variable is called a multivariate regression.

(a) Adult mortality vs. life expectancy. (b) Schooling vs. life expectancy.

Figure 1: Visualization of the relationship between explanatory variables and the target variable.

In this assignment, you will develop functions that perform univariate regression (Part I) and multivariate

regression (Part 2) and use them to answer questions on a dataset on life expectancy, similar to the example

above.

To help you to visually check and understand your implementation, a module for plotting data and linear

prediction functions is provided.

3

Part 1: Univariate Regression (10%, due in Week 6)

The first task is to model a linear relationship between one explanatory variable and the target variable.

The data in this assignment is always represented as a table containing m rows and n columns and a list

of length m containing the corresponding target variables. The table is represented as a list with m elements,

each being a list of n values, one for each explanatory variable.

An example dataset with one explanatory variable x and a target variable y would be

>>> x = [1,2,3]

>>> y = [1,4,6]

and an example dataset with two explanatory variables x

(1), x(2) would be

>>> data = [[1,1],[2,1],[1,3]]

>>> y = [3,4,7]

Task A: Optimal Slope (2 Marks)

Let us now start by modelling the linear relationship between one explanatory variable x and the target variable

y based on the data of m observations (x1, y1), . . . ,(xm, ym). For that, let’s start out simple by modelling the

relation of x and y as

y = ax , (1)

i.e., a straight line through the origin. For this model we want to find an optimal slope parameter a that fits

the given data as good as possible. A central concept to solve this problem is the residual vector defined as

r =y1 − ax1y2 − ax2. . .ym − axm,

i.e., the m-component vector that contains for each data point the difference of the target value and the

corresponding predicted value. Intuitively, for a good fit, all components of the residual vector should have a

small magnitude (being all 0 for a perfect fit). A popular approach is to determine the optimal parameter value

a as the one that minimises the sum of squared components of the residual vector, i.e.,

which we also refer to as the sum of squared residuals. With some math (that is outside the scope of this

unit) we can show that for the slope parameter a that minimises the sum of squared residuals it holds that the

explanatory data is orthogonal to the residual vector, i.e.,

x · r = 0 . (2)

Here, · refers to the dot product of two vectors, which in this case is

x · r = x1r1 + x2r2 + · · · + xmrm .

Pluging in the definition of r into Equation 2 yields

(x · x) a = x · y (3)

from which we can easily find the optimal slope a.

Instructions

Based on Equation 3, write a function slope(x, y) that computes the optimal slope for the simple regression

model in Equation 1.

Input: Two lists of numbers (x and y) of equal length representing data of an explanatory and a target variable.

Output: The optimal least squares slope (a) with respect to the given data.

For example:

4

def slope(x, y):

"""

Computes the slope of the least squares regression line

(without intercept) for explaining y through x.

>>> slope([0, 1, 2], [0, 2, 4])

2.0

>>> slope([0, 2, 4], [0, 1, 2])

0.5

>>> slope([0, 1, 2], [1, 1, 2])

1.0

>>> slope([0, 1, 2], [1, 1.2, 2])

1.04

"""

If you want to visualize the data and predictor, you can use the plotting functions provided in plotting.py.

For example

>>> X = [0, 1, 2]

>>> Y = [1, 1, 2]

>>> a = slope(X, Y)

>>> b = 0

>>> linear(a,b, x_min=0, x_max=2)

>>> plot2DData(X, Y)

>>> plt.show()

Figure 2: Example plot generated with the functions

provided in plotting.py.

will produce the plot given in Figure 2.

Task B: Optimal Slope and Intercept (3 Marks)

Figure 3: Linear regression with and without an intercept

for three points (0, 1),(1, 1.2), and (2, 2).

Consider the example regression problem in Figure 3.

Even with an optimal choice of a the regression model

y = ax of Equation 1 does not fit the data well. In

particular the point (0, 1) is problematic because the

model given in Equation 1 is forced to run through

the origin and thus has no degree of freedom to fit

a data point with x = 0. To improve this, we have

to consider regression lines that are not forced to run

through the origin by extending the model equation

to

y = ax + b (4)

where in addition to the slope a we also have an additive

term b called the intercept. Now we have two

parameters a and b to optimise, but it turns out that

a simple modification of Equation 3 lets us solve this

more complicated problem.

Instead of the residual being orthogonal to the explanatory

data as is, we now require orthogonality to

the centred version of the data.

with µ = (x1 + x2 + · · · + xm)/m being the mean value of the explanatory data. Again, we can rewrite the

5

above condition as a simple linear equation involving two dot-products

(x · x) a = x · y (5)

which again allows to easily determine the slope a. However, now we also need to find the optimal intercept b

corresponding to this value of a. For this we can simply find the average target value minus the average fitted

value when only using the slope (or in other words the average residual):

b = ((y1 − ax1) + · · · + (ym − axm))/m . (6)

Instructions

Using Equations (5) and (6) above, write a function line(x, y) that computes the optimal slope and intercept

for the regression model in Equation 4

Input: Two lists of numbers (x and y) of equal length representing data of an explanatory and a target variable.

Output: A tuple (a,b) where a is the optimal least squares slope and b the optimal intercept with respect to

the given data.

For example

>>> line([0, 1, 2], [1, 1, 2])

(0.5, 0.8333333333333333)

Task C: Best Single Variable Predictor (4 Marks)

(2) and target variable y with m = 3 observations given

in Table 2. We can see that the model y = −0, 29x

(2) +

2.14 is more accurate than the model y = 0.07x

(1) + 1.5.

We are now able to determine a regression model that

represents the linear relationship between a target

variable and a single explanatory variable. However,

in usual settings like the one given in the introduction,

we observe not one but many explanatory variables

(e.g., in the example ‘GDP’, ‘Schooling’, etc.).

As an abstract description of such a setting we consider

n variables x

(1), x(2), . . . , x(n)

such that for each

j with 0 ≤ j < n we have measured m observations

x(j)1, . . . , x(j)m . These conceptually correspond to the

columns of a given data table. The individual rows of

our data table then become n-dimensional data points

that we again denote by x1, . . . xm,

A general, i.e., multi-dimensional, linear predictor

is then given by an n-dimensional weight vector a

and an intercept b that together describe the target

variable as:

y = (a · x) + b , (7)

i.e., we generalise Equation 4 by turning the slope a into a n-component linear weight vector and replace

simple multiplication by the dot product (the intercept b is still a single number). Part 2 of the assignment will

be about finding such general linear predictors. In this task, however, we will start out simply by finding the

best univariate predictor and then represent it using a multivariate weight-vector a. Thus, we need to answer

two questions:

1. How to find the best univariate predictor (i.e., the one with the smallest sum of squared residuals)?

2. How to represent it as a multivariate predictor (i.e., in the form of Equation (7))?

6

x

(1) x

(2) y

1 0 2

2 3 1

4 2 2

Table 2: Example dataset

with n = 2 explanatory

variables x

(1) and x

(2), and

a target variable y with m =

3 observations.

Consider the simple example from Figure 4 with two explanatory variables

(the data is shown in Table 2). Here, the univariate model

y = −0.29x

(2) + 2.14 ,

i.e., a

(2) = −0.29, b

(2) = 2.14, is better than

y = 0.07x

(1) + 1.5 ,

i.e., a

(1) = 0.07, b

(1) = 1.5. Hence, our multivariate model in the form of Equation

(7) is

y = ((0, −0.29) · x) + 2.14 .

Of course, for a general dataset with n explanatory variables x

(1), . . . , x(n) and a target variable y we have to

compare n different univariate predictors and embed the best one into an n-dimensional weight vector.

Instructions

Based on the functions for fitting univariate regression lines, write a function best single predictor(data,

y) that computes a general linear predictor (i.e., one that is defined for multi-dimensional data points) by

picking the best univariate prediction model from all available explanatory variables.

Input: Table data with m > 0 rows and n > 0 columns representing data of n explanatory variables and a list

y of length m containing the values of the target variable corresponding to the rows in the table.

Output: A pair (a, b) of a list a of length n and a number b representing a linear predictor with weights a

and intercept b with the following properties:

a) There is only one non-zero element of a, i.e., there is one i in range(n) such that a[j]==0 for all

indices j!=i.

b) The predictor represented by (a, b) has the smallest possible squared error among all predictors

that satisfy property a).

For example (see Figure 4):

>>> data = [[1, 0],

... [2, 3],

... [4, 2]]

>>> y = [2, 1, 2]

>>> weights, b = best_single_predictor(data, y)

>>> weights, b

([0.0, -0.2857142857142858], 2.1428571428571432)

Task D: Regression Analysis (1 Marks)

You have now developed the tools to carry out a regression analysis. In this task, you will perform a regression

analysis on the life-expectancy dataset an excerpt of which was used as an example in the overview. The dataset

provided in the file /data/life_expectancy.csv.

Instructions

Find the best single predictor for the life expectancy dataset and use this predictor to answer the following two

questions:

1. What life expectancy does your model predict for Rwanda?

2. What life expectancy does your model predict for Liberia, if Liberia improved its “schooling” to the level

of Austria?

You can perform the analysis in a function regression analysis or dynamically in the console. Provide the

results of your analysis in the documentation.

7

Part 2: Multivariate Regression (12%, due in Week 11)

In part 1 we have developed a method to find a univariate linear regression model (i.e., one that models the

relationship between a single explanatory variable and the target variable), as well as a method that picks the

best univariate regression model when multiple explanatory variables are available. In this part, we develop a

multivariate regression method that models the joint linear relationship between all explanatory variables and

the target variable.

Task A: Greedy Residual Fitting (6 Marks)

We start using a greedy approach to multivariate regression. Assume a dataset with m data points x1, . . . , xm

where each data point x has n explanatory variables x

(1), . . . , x(n)

, and corresponding target variables y1, . . . , ym.

The goal is to find the slopes for all explanatory variables that help predicting the target variable. The strategy

we use greedily picks the best predictor and adds its slope to the list of used predictors. When all slopes are

computed, it finds the best intercept.

Figure 5: Continuation of the example given in Figure

4. The plane depicts the multivariate regression

obtain from greedy residual fitting. The error of this

model is lower than the individual regressions on x

(1)

and x

(2)

For that, recall that a greedy algorithm iteratively

extends a partial solution by a small augmentation

that optimises some selection criterion. In our setting,

those augmentation options are the inclusion of

a currently unused explanatory variable (i.e., one that

currently still has a zero coefficient). As selection criterion,

it makes sense to look at how much a previously

unused explanatory variable can improve the

data fit of the current predictor.

because it specifies the part of the target variable that

is still not well explained. Note that a the slope of a

predictor that predicts this residual well is a good option

for augmenting the current solution. Also, recall

that an augmentation is used only if it improves the

selection criterion. In this case, a reasonable selection

criterion is again the sum of squared residuals.

What is left to do is compute the intercept for the

multivariate predictor. This can be done similar to

Equation 6 as

b = ((y1 − a · x1) + · · · + (ym − a · xm)) /m .

The resulting multivariate predictor can then be written as in Equation 7. An example multivariate regression

is shown in Figure 5.

Instructions

Write a function greedy predictor that computes a multivariate predictor using the greedy strategy similar

to the one described above.

Input: A data table data of explanatory variables with m rows and n columns and a list of corresponding target

variables y.

Output: A tuple (a,b) where a is the weight vector and b the intercept obtained by the greedy strategy.

For example (the first example is visualized in Figure 5)

>>> data = [[1, 0],

... [2, 3],

... [4, 2]]

>>> y = [2, 1, 2]

>>> weights, intercept = greedy_predictor(data, y)

>>> weights, intercept

8

[0.21428571428571436, -0.2857142857142858] 1.642857142857143

>>> data = [[0, 0],

... [1, 0],

... [0, -1]]

>>> y = [1, 0, 0]

>>> weights, intercept = greedy_predictor(data, y)

>>> weights, intercept

[-0.49999999999999994, 0.7499999999999999] 0.7499999999999999

Task B: Optimal Least Squares Regression (6 Marks)

least squares regression

Figure 6: Continuation of the example given in Figure 5.

The plot depicts the optimal least squares regression

and compares it to the greedy solution (for reference,

the best single predictors are shown as well). The least

squares regression has the smallest error.

Recall that the central idea for finding the slope of the

optimal univariate regression line (with intercept) was

Equation 2 that stated that the residual vector has to

be orthogonal to the values of the centred explanatory

variable. For multivariate regression we have

many variables, and it is not surprising that for an

optimal linear predictor a · x + b, it holds that the

residual vector is orthogonal to each of the centred

explanatory variables (otherwise we could change the

predictor vector a bit to increase the fit). That is, instead

of a single linear equation, we now end up with

n equations,

(8)

For the weight vector a that satisfies these equations

for all i = 0, . . . , n − 1, you can again simply find the

matching intercept b as the mean residual when using

just the weights a for fitting:

b = ((y1 − a · x1) + · · · + (ym − a · xm))/m .

In summary, we know that we can simply transform the problem of finding the least squares predictor to

solving a system of linear equation, which we can solve by Gaussian Elimination as covered in the lecture. An

illustration of such a least squares predictor is given in Figure 6.

Instructions

1. Write a function equation(i, data, y) that produces the coefficients and the right-hand-side of the

linear equation for explanatory variable x

(i)

(as specified in Equation (8)).

Input: Integer i with 0 <= i < n, data matrix data with m rows and n columns such that m > 0 and n

> 0, and list of target values y of length n.

Output: Pair (c, d) where c is a list of coefficients of length n and d is a float representing the coefficients

and right-hand-side of Equation 8 for data column i.

For example (see Figure 6):

>>> data = [[1, 0],

... [2, 3],

... [4, 2]]

>>> target = [2, 1, 2]

>>> equation(0, data, target)

([4.666666666666666, 2.3333333333333326], 0.3333333333333326)

>>> equation(1, data, target)

([2.333333333333333, 4.666666666666666], -1.3333333333333335)

2. Write a function least squares predictor(data, y) that finds the optimal least squares predictor for

the given data matrix and target vector.

Input: Data matrix data with m rows and n columns such that m > 0 and n > 0.

9

Output: Optimal predictor (a, b) with weight vector a (len(a)==n) and intercept b such that a, b

minimise the sum of squared residuals.

For Example:

>>> data = [[0, 0],

... [1, 0],

... [0, -1]]

>>> y = [1, 0, 0]

>>> weights, intercept = least_squares_predictor(data, y)

>>> weights, intercept

([-0.9999999999999997, 0.9999999999999997], 0.9999999999999998)

>>> data = [[1, 0],

... [2, 3],

... [4, 2]]

>>> y = [2, 1, 2]

>>> weights, intercept = least_squares_predictor(data, y)

>>> weights, intercept

([0.2857142857142855, -0.4285714285714285], 1.7142857142857149)

10